Assertional-based Removed Set Revision of DL-LiteR Belief Bases
نویسندگان
چکیده
DL-Lite is a tractable fragment of Description Logics, which provides a powerful framework to compactly encode available knowledge with a low computational complexity of the reasoning process. Belief revision is an important problem that appears in many applications and especially in the semantic web area. This paper investigates the so-called “Removed Sets Revision” for revising DL-Lite knowledge bases when a new sure piece of information, called an input, is added. Such strategy of revision is based on inconsistency minimization and consists in determining smallest subsets of axioms that should be dropped from the current DL-Lite knowledge base in order to restore its consistency and accept the input. We consider different forms of the input: a positive inclusion axiom, a negative inclusion axiom and a membership assertion. We then show how to use the notion of hitting sets for computing removed sets. We show in particular, for some revision strategies and some kinds of inputs, that the removed sets revision can be achieved in polynomial time. Finally, we rephrase the Hansson’s postulates for belief bases revision within a DL-Lite framework in order to give logical properties of removed sets revision operators.
منابع مشابه
Syntactic Propositional Belief Bases Fusion with Removed Sets
The problem of merging multiple sources information is central in several domains of computer science. In knowledge representation for artificial intelligence, several approaches have been proposed for propositional bases fusion, however, most of them are defined at a semantic level and are untractable. This paper proposes a new syntactic approach of belief bases fusion, called Removed Sets Fus...
متن کاملMin-based Assertional Merging Approach for Prioritized DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
DL-Lite is a powerful and tractable family of description logics specifically tailored for applications that use huge volumes of data. In many real world applications, data are often provided by several and potentially conflicting sources of information having different levels of priority. Possibility theory offers a very natural framework to deal with ordinal and qualitative uncertain beliefs ...
متن کاملNon Defeated-Based Repair in Possibilistic DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
Possibilistic DL-Lite is an extension of the DL-Lite framework to deal with uncertain pieces of information. In this paper, we deal with inconsistency in DL-Lite in case where the assertions are uncertain and encoded in a possibility theory framework. We investigate three inconsistency-tolerant reasoning methods for possibilistic DL-Lite knowledge bases which are based on the selection of one c...
متن کاملBelief Base Revision for Expressive Description Logics
In this work, we address the problem of revision of OWL-DL knowledge bases. We focus on belief bases revision as it has previously been shown that OWL-DL is not AGM-compliant for revision. Previously an algorithm for belief base semi-revision for propositional logic has been defined; in particular it has been shown how the diagnosis problem can be translated into a revision problem. In this wor...
متن کاملBelief Contraction and Revision over DL-Lite TBoxes
In this paper, we study the operations of contraction and revision for removing and incorporating axioms over DL-Litecore and DL-LiteR TBoxes (Calvanese et al. 2007). The operations are defined in the manner of AGM model-based contraction and revision (Grove 1988; Katsuno and Mendelzon 1992) and are based on a newly defined semantics called type semantics. We show that, as an alternative to des...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014